The proposal abolishes the explicit prohibition which regulates that founders of associations and foundations can not be: the state of BiH, entities, cantons, cities, municipalities, local communities, government bodies and state-owned companies and funds.
By submitting the application the ruling coalition is not merely ignoring the reality of our country, but also the statements made by high-ranking officials of the EU who have made it clear that rushing this process is unwise.
We suggest that information on the issues discussed in the House of Representatives and its working bodies should be published on the Parliament’s official website.
The amazing fact is that the public in Bosnia and Herzegovina found out about the adoption of the coordination mechanism – one of the key issues in BiH – only fifteen days after its adoption, and not from the institution which had adopted it, but from the media which had found this decision in the Official Journal of BiH and published it.
When presenting the results of their work, judicial institutions mainly present to the general public the results of repressive actions and talk about solving crimes after they were committed, but the prevention of crimes becomes an activity itself without evaluating the efficiency, impact and sustainability.
After Bosnia and Herzegovina started with reforms that have been the basis for accession to the European Union, the issue of double or multiple taxation was raised again. Meanwhile, in the Republika Srpska entity that way of taxation was introduced, and the Federation of BiH entity considers to start with that practice no later than March of this year.
The role of the police in a democratic society has an aim at maintaining public order, prevention and repression of crime, protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, and any other form of coordinated activities with the citizens.
The murky aspect of the issue of ‘dealing with the past’ is the leadership of the political parties that gain support in Bosniak-majority areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This part of the political spectrum actually tends to monopolize the claim to concern for the common future and the multiethnic society, and poses itself as the ‘guarantor’ of the country’s integrity.
Many issues would never have been brought up in the official Progress Report had they not been opened and given a well-argued presentation in the Alternative Progress Report of the civic Initiative for monitoring the European integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Domestic human rights organizations and their human rights potential find themselves on the operational and service delivery level of human rights where, in terms of management, transactional leadership is usually required.
Yet, it is still an arena for a different political culture. Voices of many marginal and discriminated groups in BH, such as LGBT people, are starting to be heard thanks to activities of the civil society. In civil society, the very notion of citizenship and political participation is not questioned, but placed within a broader context and critical thinking regarding the very possibility of participation and emancipation within the rules imposed by the system itself.
Contrary to the “obvious” desire of the population, their political elites in political practice seemed to have favoured other issues over the EU integration. In all honesty, when asked, all politicians, without exception, are strongly supportive of Bosnia’s bid for accession to the EU, but when it comes to making any meaningful practical steps in this direction, their determination somehow seems to lose steam.